Whitaker
Landis' Labyrinth v. Whitaker
Opinion
Opinion
Egerton, J.
Filed 12/3/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
LANDIS’ LABYRINTH, INC., B339581
Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 23STCV00964
BRIAN WHITAKER et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Timothy Patrick Dillon and Rolf M. Treau, Judges. Reversed in part, affirmed in part.
Samuel T. Rees for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Hannah Law, Jeffrey Hannah and Russell Handy for Defendants and Respondents. _________________________ Landis’ Labyrinth, Inc. (Landis) appeals a judgment in a malicious prosecution action. In the underlying case, Brian Whitaker sued Landis for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the ADA) and the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq., the Unruh Act).1 Russell Handy and his firm, Potter Handy, LLP, represented Whitaker in the action. Whitaker alleged he visited Landis’s toy store but was dissuaded from making a purchase because the sales counter was too high for him to use…