Thomas

Thomas v. HNJ Starfish CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2025B333073California3,372 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/3/25 Thomas v. HNJ Starfish CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

JAQUAY THOMAS, B333073

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV01147) v.

HNJ STARFISH,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a post-trial order and judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gregory Alarcon, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Peggy A. Farrell, Peggy A. Farrell; Hennig Kramer Ruiz & Singh, Jennifer R. Kramer, Brandon K. Ruiz, Sereena J. Singh, Ashley Cruz; Law Offices of Rob Henning and Robert A. Hennig; Gusdorff Law and Janet Gusdorff for Plaintiff and Appellant. The Ruttenberg Law Firm and Mark A. O’Brien for Defendant and Respondent. _______________________ After securing a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.