Marriage of Hite CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2025B334672California292 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 12/3/25 Marriage of Hite CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re Marriage of SEAN HITE 2d Civ. No. B334672 and KAITLIN HITE. (Super. Ct. No. 22FL01889) (Santa Barbara County)

SEAN HITE,

Appellant,

v.

KAITLIN HITE,

Respondent.

Sean Hite (Husband) appeals from an interlocutory discovery order in a marital dissolution case. We dismiss his appeal because the order is not appealable. Husband challenges the trial court’s ruling on Kaitlin Hite (Wife)’s motion to compel further discovery responses. The trial court ordered Husband to provide further responses and pay $5,000 in sanctions; the sanctions order was stayed until after judgment. A discovery motion order is not appealable. (Doe v. United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.