Udani

Udani v. Samsung Electronics America CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2025B341326California3,246 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hanasono, J.

Filed 12/3/25 Udani v. Samsung Electronics America CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

NIMESH UDANI, B341326

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV20962) v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

AMERICA, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Maren E. Nelson, Judge. Affirmed. Spitz Law Group, Jeffrey Spitz; and Paul S. Rothstein for Plaintiff and Appellant. Hunton Andrews Kurth, Thomas R. Waksom, Brandon M. Marvisi, Michael J. Mueller, and Grant H. Cokeley, for Defendants and Respondents. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ In this class action lawsuit, the trial court conditionally granted plaintiffs’ motion to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.