Udani
Udani v. Samsung Electronics America CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
Hanasono, J.
Filed 12/3/25 Udani v. Samsung Electronics America CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
NIMESH UDANI, B341326
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV20962) v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Maren E. Nelson, Judge. Affirmed. Spitz Law Group, Jeffrey Spitz; and Paul S. Rothstein for Plaintiff and Appellant. Hunton Andrews Kurth, Thomas R. Waksom, Brandon M. Marvisi, Michael J. Mueller, and Grant H. Cokeley, for Defendants and Respondents. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ In this class action lawsuit, the trial court conditionally granted plaintiffs’ motion to file a…