Ydigoras

Michael Ydigoras v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20253:25-cv-01394California4,334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MICHAEL YDIGORAS, Case No.: 3:25-cv-01394-RBM-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION,

[Doc. 3] Defendant. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation’s (“Defendant” or “Costco”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Doc. 3.) Pro se Plaintiff Michael Ydigoras (“Plaintiff”) filed an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“Opposition”) (Doc. 4), and Defendant filed a Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“Reply”). (Doc. 5.) The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Having reviewed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.