Matthew

Jacob Matthew v. Christopher Palomares, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20253:25-cv-01665California2,429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

21 On June 30, 2025, Plaintiff Jacob Matthew, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint for 22 the seizure of his automobile on tribal land. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff concurrently filed a 23 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 24 2). The Court found that Plaintiff was unable to pay the filing fee but dismissed the case 25

27 1 The Complaint was docketed on July 7, 2025. However, the Court received it on June 30, 2025, in paper 28 with leave to amend for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)’s screening requirement. (ECF No. 8 at 2, 4). Plaintiff then filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on July 22, 2025, which is subject to a second sua sponte review here. (FAC, ECF No. 11). In addition to the FAC, Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Motion to File Documents Under Seal, and Motion to Clarify Equitable Status. (Prelim. Inj. Mot., ECF No. 10; Sealing Mot., ECF No. 12; Equitable Status Mot., ECF No. 9). Plaintiff later filed an Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Pleading. (Suppl. Pleading Mot., ECF No. 14). For the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.