Ledezma

Joe Ledezma v. M. Ramirez, Reviewing Authority; M. Palmer, Reviewing Authority

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20253:25-cv-01585California5,953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE LEDEZMA, Case No.: 3:25-cv-01585-BTM-MMP

CDCR #H-84273,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS AND (2) DISMISSING

COMPLAINT FOR FAILING TO

STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT

M. RAMIREZ, Reviewing Authority;

TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) M. PALMER, Reviewing Authority, AND 1915A(b) Defendants. [ECF No. 3] 18 19 Plaintiff Joe Ledezma, who is proceeding pro se and incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1), together with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 3). Ledezma claims two prison grievance officials at RJD refused to timely process his grievances requesting a kosher or religious meat alternative diet accommodation after he converted to Judaism. See Compl. at 2‒5. Ledezma seeks both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.