Allaf-Motedayen
Farzad Allaf-Motedayen v. Sonoma County Child Protective Services, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FARZAD ALLAF-MOTEDAYEN, Case No. 25-cv-03050-MMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING THIRD
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT
FURTHER LEAVE TO AMEND;
SONOMA COUNTY CHILD DIRECTIONS TO CLERK PROTECTIVE SERVICES, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is plaintiff Farzad Allaf-Motedayen's Third Amended Complaint "TAC"), filed July 15, 2025 (Doc. No. 21). As plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis, the Court must consider whether the TAC contains any cognizable claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (providing, in action where plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis, district court "shall" dismiss case if action "is frivolous or malicious," "fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted," or "seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief"). By order filed April 14, 2025, Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim, to whom the above- titled action was then assigned, dismissed plaintiff's initial complaint for…