I.E.

I.E. v. JEREMY CASEY, Warden, Imperial Regional Detention Facility; et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20253:25-cv-03227California370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 25cv3227 DMS (DDL)

I.E.,

Petitioner-Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

JEREMY CASEY, Warden, Imperial Regional Detention Facility; et al., 14 Respondents-Defendants.

16 17 This case comes before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for a temporary restraining order. Respondents filed an opposition to the motion, and Petitioner filed a reply. The facts, claims, and arguments in this case are similar to those presented in Sadeqi v. LaRose, No. 25-cv-2587-RSH-BJW, 2025 WL 3154520 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2025). The Court finds the reasoning of that case persuasive, and adopts and applies it wholesale to this case. The only argument Respondents raise here that was not addressed in Sadeqi is Respondents’ jurisdictional argument, but the Court has already addressed and rejected that argument in previous orders. See Soleimani v. LaRose, Case No. 25-cv-3082-DMS-DEB,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.