Hendrix
Adam Hendrix v. Leonardo Garcia, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ADAM HENDRIX, Case No. 25-cv-09674-CRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v.
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER
LEONARDO GARCIA, et al., Defendants.
Plaintiff Adam Hendrix, proceeding pro se, brought an action against a host of different defendants. Compl. (dkt. 1). After filing the instant action, Hendrix filed an emergency motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). Mot. (dkt. 2). His motion—composed of two sentences and without any argument—is so devoid of detail that the Court cannot identify the grounds for the injunctive relief sought. See Mot. Since Hendrix’s complaint is highly confusing and does not present a short and plain statement of Hendrix’s claims, the Court fails to divine the bases for Hendrix’s relief in the pleadings, too. See Compl. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Hendrix’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Adam Hendrix1 alleges two injuries: (1) the entry of a no-contact order in …