Hector Ambriz v. Charter Communications, LLC; Carol Steen; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20252:25-cv-06814California4,008 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3 JS-6

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

13 HECTOR AMBRIZ, an individual, Case No.: 2:25-cv-06814-MEMF-MARx

14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF HECTOR 15 v. AMBRIZ’S MOTION TO REMAND [DKT.

NO. 8]

16 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a

Delaware limited liability company; CAROL 17 STEEN, an individual, and DOES 1 through 50, 18 inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 22

23 Before the Court is the Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Hector Ambriz. Dkt. No. 8. 24 Defendant Charter Communications, LLC filed an Opposition. Dkt. No. 12. Plaintiff then filed a 25 Response to the Opposition. Dkt. No. 13. For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby GRANTS 26 Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. 27 // 28 1 I. Background

2 A. Factual Background1

3 Pl aintiff in this action is Hector Ambriz (“Plaintiff”), an individual residing in Los Angeles 4 Count y, California. He was employed by Defendants from approximately August 1, 2022, to 5 Decem ber 13, 2023. Dkt. No. 1-2 ¶ 1. Defendants in this action are Charter Communications, LLC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.