Stites

Christopher Blake Stites v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20253:25-cv-00009California2,098 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER BLAKE STITES, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00009-CAB-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING FOR

v. EVALUATION OF PARAGRAPH C

CRITERIA

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 [Doc. No. 10] Defendant. 16 On January 2, 2025, Plaintiff Chrisopher Blake Stites (“Plaintiff” or “Stites”) filed a complaint challenging Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner” or “Agency”) denial of his application for Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. [Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”) at 1.] Briefing on the merits is complete. [Doc. Nos. 10 (“Opening”), 13 (“Opposition”), and 14 (“Reply”).] Having considered the parties’ arguments, applicable law, and the record before it, and for the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s decision is REMANDED with instruction to evaluate whether Plaintiff’s mental impairments establish the paragraph C criteria. /// /// /// /// I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.