Neaderbaomer

Neaderbaomer v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202524-5906California950 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 4 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL NEADERBAOMER, No. 24-5906 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:20-cv-07888-JWH-AS v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 21, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Michael Neaderbaomer appeals the district court’s order granting

the Government’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant’s

complaint with prejudice. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Consumers

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Union of U.S., Inc., 330 F.3d 1110, 1131 (9th Cir. 2003).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.