Dream Big Media Inc. v. Alphabet Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202524-4968California1,111 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 4 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DREAM BIG MEDIA INC.; et al., Nos. 24-4968

Plaintiffs - Appellants, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-02314-RS v.

ALPHABET INC. and GOOGLE LLC, MEMORANDUM*

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 20, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Dream Big Media, Inc., Getify Solutions, Inc., and Sprinter Supplier LLC on

behalf of a putative class, (collectively, “Dream Big Media”) appeal the district

court’s dismissal with prejudice of their Second Amended Complaint. Dream Big

Media brings claims of negative tying and exclusive dealing under the Sherman

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Antitrust Act (“Sherman Act”) §§ 1 and 3 and the Clayton Antitrust Act (“Clayton

Act”) § 3 against Alphabet, Inc. and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.