Cox

Cox v. Bennett

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202524-6842California576 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 4 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN GLENN COX, No. 24-6842

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-05036-TMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JASON BENNETT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington

Tiffany M. Cartwright, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 21, 2025 Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Brian Cox appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition as

untimely. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”),

“[a] 1-year period of limitation shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas

corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court.”

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We

review de novo the dismissal of a habeas petition as untimely. Ford v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.