Navarro

United States v. Navarro

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202525-661California875 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-661 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00154-SB-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

LOURDES NAVARRO, AKA Lulu,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 23, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and COLE, District Judge.**

Defendant-Appellant Lourdes Navarro appeals the district court’s denial of

her motion to dismiss the indictment and entry of final judgment. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review de novo. United States v. Blixt,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Douglas Russell Cole, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. 548 F.3d 882, 886 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.