Singh
Singh v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202525-1794California550 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HARMINDER SINGH, No. 25-1794 Agency No. Petitioner, A077-810-699 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 1, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: R. NELSON, COLLINS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Harminder Singh, a citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) decision dismissing an appeal from a decision by an
Immigration Judge, which denied Singh’s applications for asylum, withholding of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.