Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202525-1794California550 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARMINDER SINGH, No. 25-1794 Agency No. Petitioner, A077-810-699 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 1, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: R. NELSON, COLLINS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Harminder Singh, a citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) decision dismissing an appeal from a decision by an

Immigration Judge, which denied Singh’s applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

We review the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.