Salazar

BACKGROUND

1. Plaintiff’s expressive activity Plaintiff identifies himself as “an activist with a strong interest in increasing dialog about men’s reproductive rights and responsibilities.” As described by the trial court, “Plaintiff seeks to explain that men have a legal right to decide whether to pay child support for a child born outside of marriage, a movement which he has coined men’s eMANcipation.” Plaintiff wishes to “bring[ ] people together to discuss the issue,” and has “created a 12-point, hour-long[ ] presentation on the topic.” To inform people of the meetings at which he intends to give his presentation, plaintiff distributes flyers at shopping centers. 1 Two such flyers are in the record. The first states, “Men are not owned by women through their bodies!” (Boldface & some capitalization omitted.) It continues, “Men are not legally and financially responsible for supporting a child that a woman chooses to have, for women’s reproductive decisions that only a woman can make with her female body, and for what women do with their bodies. And a man has the right to choose to support a child for any child born outside of marriage. [¶] Learn about men’s eMANcipation…