Zhang

Hang Zhang v. Daniel Driscoll

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20253:25-cv-03381California4,121 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HANG ZHANG, Case No. 25-cv-03381-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION;

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

DANIEL DRISCOLL, Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Hang Zhang’s motion for preliminary injunction. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for November 13, 2025, was VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-6, Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b); see also Dkt. No. 30. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES the motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Zhang brings this employment discrimination action in relation to her employment with the Defense Language Institute (“DLI”) as a Student Learning Specialist. See First Am. Compl. (Dkt. No. 23, “FAC”). Zhang alleges that during a structural reorganization on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.