Wesco Insurance Company v. Sentry Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 25-cv-07584-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Wesco Insurance Company (“Wesco”) brings this action in subrogation against Defendant Sentry Insurance Company (“Sentry”), alleging that Sentry failed to perform its obligations under an insurance contract by refusing to settle a case brought against Sentry’s insured. ECF No. 1. Pending before the Court is Sentry’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). ECF No. 12 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and VACATES the December 4, 2025, hearing. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Wesco, a Delaware…