Ferguson

International Partners for Ethical Care Inc v. Ferguson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202524-3661California8,882 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS No. 24-3661

FOR ETHICAL CARE INC;

D.C. No.

ADVOCATES PROTECTING

3:23-cv-05736-

CHILDREN; PARENT 1A;

DGE

PARENT 1B; PARENT 2A;

PARENT 2B; PARENT 3A;

PARENT 3B; PARENT 4A; ORDER

PARENT 4B; PARENT 5A;

PARENT 5B,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

ROBERT FERGUSON, Governor; NICK BROWN, Attorney General of Washington; TANA SENN, Secretary of the Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families,

Defendants - Appellees.

Filed December 5, 2025

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges. 2 INT’L PARTNERS FOR ETHICAL CARE, INC V. FERGUSON

Order; Dissent by Judge VanDyke; Dissent by Judge Tung

SUMMARY *

Article III Standing

The panel denied a petition for panel rehearing and a petition for rehearing en banc in a case in which the panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal, for lack of Article III standing, of a challenge to three Washington laws regulating the rights and privileges of Washington minors seeking access to mental health care and shelter services, particularly minors who are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.