Christian Caranto v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202515-73258California734 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CHRISTIAN KIM CARANTO, No. 15-73258 Agency No. Petitioner,

A095-684-210

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 1, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, BEA and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Christian Kim Caranto (“Caranto”) petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his applications for

withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 (“CAT”). The parties are familiar with the facts, so we do not recount them here.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

Caranto’s evidence does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.