Cecilia Armenta Mendoza v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202515-73712California600 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CECILIA ARMENTA MENDOZA, No. 15-73712

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-201-445

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, BEA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Cecilia Armenta Mendoza (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of the

decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) and an immigration judge

(“IJ”) denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to

U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

1. “Where, as here, the BIA agrees with the IJ’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.