Cecilia Armenta Mendoza v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202515-73712California600 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CECILIA ARMENTA MENDOZA, No. 15-73712
Petitioner, Agency No. A200-201-445
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 3, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: GOULD, BEA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Cecilia Armenta Mendoza (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of the
decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) and an immigration judge
(“IJ”) denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to
U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.
1. “Where, as here, the BIA agrees with the IJ’s…