Artemisa Lopez Ramirez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202519-72979California752 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTEMISA B. LOPEZ RAMIREZ, No. 19-72979

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-304-583

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: McKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

Artemisa Lopez Ramirez (“Lopez Ramirez”) petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) order affirming the immigration judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. (“IJ’s”) order denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.