Vail-Martinez
Vail-Martinez v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALEJANDRA ITZAMARA VAIL- No. 25-1170 MARTINEZ; C. A. M.-V., Agency Nos.
A213-154-621
Petitioners, A213-154-622 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 3, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL, District Judge.*** Alejandra Itzamara Vail-Martinez (Vail-Martinez) and her minor child,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. 1 Vail-Martinez petitions for her child as a derivative beneficiary.