Vail-Martinez

Vail-Martinez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202525-1170California908 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRA ITZAMARA VAIL- No. 25-1170 MARTINEZ; C. A. M.-V., Agency Nos.

A213-154-621

Petitioners, A213-154-622 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL, District Judge.*** Alejandra Itzamara Vail-Martinez (Vail-Martinez) and her minor child,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. 1 Vail-Martinez petitions for her child as a derivative beneficiary.

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.