Bondi

Castillo Escalante v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202525-860California1,177 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO MIGUEL CASTILLO No. 25-860 ESCALANTE; ZAIRA ROSEBET CRUZ Agency Nos.

CACERES, A208-128-005

A208-128-006

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: McKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER, District Judge.*** Francisco Castillo Escalante (“Castillo Escalante”) and his wife Zaira

Rosebet Cruz Caceres (“Caceres”) petition for review of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.