Canul-Mukul

Canul-Mukul v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202525-2281California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS CANUL-MUKUL, No. 25-2281 Agency No. Petitioner, A077-118-795 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 1, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, BEA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Luis Canul-Mukul, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from

an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying his applications for cancellation of

removal, asylum, withholding of removal, adjustment of status, and protection

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1252, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.