Argueta

Argueta v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202525-520California1,292 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOEL ANTONIO ARGUETA, No. 25-520 Agency No. Petitioner, A094-311-557 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 1, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, BEA, and BADE, Circuit Judges

Petitioner Joel Antonio Argueta petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen proceedings

for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) based on

changed country conditions or sua sponte. Argueta originally sought deferral of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal under CAT, contending that he would face torture from the Farabundo

Marti National Liberation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.