Argueta
Argueta v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202525-520California1,292 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOEL ANTONIO ARGUETA, No. 25-520 Agency No. Petitioner, A094-311-557 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 1, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: GOULD, BEA, and BADE, Circuit Judges
Petitioner Joel Antonio Argueta petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen proceedings
for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) based on
changed country conditions or sua sponte. Argueta originally sought deferral of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal under CAT, contending that he would face torture from the Farabundo