Aparicio-Salgado
Aparicio-Salgado v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAIME APARICIO-SALGADO, No. 23-242 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-312-791 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 20, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: BYBEE, LEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Jaime Aparicio-Salgado, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a
decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of
an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for cancellation of removal,
asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.