Aguirre-Vargas

Aguirre-Vargas v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202525-3330California685 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR AGUIRRE-VARGAS, No. 25-3330 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-706-236 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: R. NELSON, COLLINS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Julio Cesar Aguirre-Vargas (“Aguirre”), a native and citizen of

Guatemala, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision

dismissing an appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Aguirre’s

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”) protection. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.