People v. Murillo CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 2025H051886California6,565 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/5/25 P. v. Murillo CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H051886

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. C1899933)

v.

ROSEL TORRES MURILLO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Rosel Torres Murillo was convicted by jury of various sexual offenses against his minor stepdaughter. He contends on appeal that, among other things, the trial judge was biased against him; his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective; the prosecutor committed numerous acts of misconduct during the trial; and the evidence against him was legally insufficient. Finding no reversible error, we will affirm the judgment.

I. TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS

Defendant was charged with oral copulation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.