People v. Burke CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 2025H052332California3,162 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lie, J.

I. BACKGROUND

The Santa Cruz County District Attorney charged Burke with murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)),1 and alleged that he personally used a deadly weapon (a knife) to commit the offense (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)). The district attorney further alleged a prior

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. conviction for attempted murder (§§ 664, 187, subd. (a)), which qualified both as a strike offense (§§ 1170.12, 667, subds. (b)–(i)) and a serious felony (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)). A. Jury Trial

Neoklis Koumides, an unhoused person, was stabbed to death in a parking garage in Santa Cruz, where he sometimes stayed to keep warm. The sole disputed issue at trial was the identity of his killer. Video surveillance footage showed that shortly before the stabbing, S.O. was at the garage with Koumides but then biked to Burke’s nearby apartment building at 4:46 a.m.2 Burke’s cell phone records indicated that he answered a call from S.O. on his call box at about 4:48 a.m. At 4:54 a.m., video surveillance footage showed Burke leaving his apartment wearing a red hat, khaki pants, gloves, trench coat, and white “Croc” shoes bearing a black skull logo. Burke, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.