Aparicio

Aparicio v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 2025B343586California3,728 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 12/5/25 Aparicio v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Bd. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

TEOFILO APARICIO, B343586

Petitioner, (W.C.A.B. Nos. ADJ8471459,

ADJ10571336)

v.

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

APPEALS BOARD, KING

FISH, INC., et al.,

Respondents.

Petition for a writ of review from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. Annulled and remanded. Solov & Teitell and Karen Phung for Petitioner. Allison J. Fairchild for Respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. Kirk, Myers, Palta & Izurieta, Jeffrey Myers and Kirk Mori for Respondents King Fish, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Law Offices of Bradford & Barthel and Louis A. Larres for Respondents King Fish,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.