Washeleski

Pawl Washeleski v. City of Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20255:25-cv-05231California1,488 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAWL WASHELESKI, Case No. 25-cv-05231-EKL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND AND TERMINATING

MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF CAMPBELL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 10 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is a motion to remand this case to Santa Clara County Superior Court filed by self-represented Plaintiff Pawl Washeleski. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and the relevant authority, the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion to remand is GRANTED, and the City of Campbell’s motion to dismiss is TERMINATED as moot. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). When a case is originally filed in state court, “[a] defendant may remove [it] to federal court based on federal question jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction.” Hunter v. Philip…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.