Marchky
JG Action Enterprises, Inc. v. Michael Marchky; Harley-Davidson of Siouxland, Inc. d/b/a Rooster’s Harley-Davidson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JG ACTION ENTERPRISES, INC., Case No. 25-cv-2108-BAS-MMP
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
MICHAEL MARCHKY; HARLEY-
UNDER RULE 12(B)(2);
DAVIDSON OF SIOUXLAND, INC.
(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S d/b/a ROOSTER’S HARLEY-
MOTION TO DISMISS
DAVIDSON,
UNDER RULE 12(B)(5); AND
Defendants. (3) TERMINATING AS MOOT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
TRANSFER VENUE
(ECF No. 5)
Presently before the Court is Defendant Michael Marchky’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5). In the alternative, Defendant seeks transfer of venue. 28 U.S.C. § 1406. The Court finds Defendant’s motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following…