Koenig

James Stanley Koenig v. C. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20252:21-cv-01145California1,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES STANLEY KOENIG, No. 2:21-cv-01145-DAD-DMC (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

C. KOENIG, PETITION SEEKING FEDERAL HABEAS

RELIEF

Respondent. (Doc. No. 49)

17 Petitioner James Stanley Koenig is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The action proceeds on petitioner’s first amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. No. 27.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 31, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that petitioner’s first amended federal habeas petition be denied. (Doc. No. 49.) The magistrate judge examined each of the seven grounds for relief asserted by petitioner. (Id. at 5.) As to the first three grounds,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.