Roy Vishwajit v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROY VISHWAJIT, Case No. 2:25-cv-11226-FLA (AJRx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

REMANDED FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Federal courts are courts of “limited jurisdiction,” possessing “only that power authorized by the Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994); U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. District courts are presumed to lack jurisdiction unless the contrary appears affirmatively from the record. See DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 342 n. 3 (2006). Additionally, federal courts have an obligation to examine jurisdiction sua sponte before proceeding to the merits of a case. See Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 583 (1999). Federal courts have jurisdiction where an action arises…