Kurgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY LEE COLLINS, No. 2:23-cv-1600 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KURGAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 6, 2025, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.” (ECF No. 62.) However, plaintiff did not sign his opposition. This is the second time plaintiff has failed to sign a document submitted to the Court for filing. As plaintiff was reminded in the Court’s February 11, 2025 order, parties proceeding without counsel are required to sign all pleadings, motions, and other papers submitted to the court for filing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Thus, the Court is unable to consider plaintiff’s opposition unless he signs and re-files the opposition. Plaintiff is provided an opportunity to re-file his opposition bearing his signature. Defendants’ motion for summary…