Lawrence
Kmaal M. Lawrence v. Edward Borla, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KMAAL M. LAWRENCE, Case No. 25-cv-06137-TLT
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF SERVICE, DENYING
v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNTION
EDWARD BORLA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff, a prisoner at Correctional Training Facility (CTF), filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint (Dkt. No. 5) is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons stated below, the complaint is ordered served on defendants Borla and Macomber.1 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek …