Hikes

Oronde Hikes v. County of Napa, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20253:25-cv-06241California1,717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORONDE HIKES, Case No. 25-cv-06241-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

COUNTY OF NAPA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendants.

Plaintiff Oronde Hikes sued Defendants County of Napa, Napa County Sheriff’s Department, County of Lake, Lake County Sheriff’s Office, Chris Perry, Nathalie Verdeille, and 50 Doe Defendants, alleging that he was injured during a prisoner transport from Lake County Jail to Napa County Jail. (Dkt. No. 1 at 4 (“Compl.”) ¶ 1.) Doe’s complaint comprised five causes of action: (1) a negligence claim against all Defendants; (2) a negligent supervision and training claim against Napa County, Napa County Sheriff’s Department, Lake County, Lake County Sheriff’s Office, and the Doe Defendants; (3) a Fourteenth Amendment claim for excessive force and failure to protect under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Perry, Verdeille, Napa County, and the Doe Defendants; (4) a Fourteenth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs under section 1983 against Perry, Verdeille, Napa County, and the Doe

1 All…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.