Samran
Inderjit Samran v. Manulife Investment Management Farmland Management Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INDERJIT SAMRAN, No. 2:24-cv-01042-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER
MANULIFE INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT FARMLAND
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,
16 Defendant. 17 18 On July 21, 2025, Defendant Manulife Investment Management Farmland Management Services, Inc. filed a Motion to Dismiss based on Plaintiff’s alleged failure to prosecute this action. (ECF No. 33.) In the Motion, Defendants argued that Plaintiff had failed to prosecute this action by failing to serve any discovery requests, respond to discovery orders from the Magistrate Judge, and communicate with Defendant’s Counsel. Defendants note that Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim had originally ordered Plaintiff to make initial disclosures and comply with production requirements on November 26, 2024. (See ECF Nos. 21, 22.) In doing so, Judge Kim gave Plaintiff the //// //// following warning: 2 Plaintiff is reminded of his duty to prosecute his case, comply with court orders, and participate in…