Padilla
Elizabeth Padilla, et al. v. Western Traffic Control, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ELIZABETH PADILLA, et al., Case No. 25-cv-07642-RS Plaintiffs, 11 Vv. ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WESTERN TRAFFIC CONTROL, INC.,
a Defendant.
On October 20, 2025, this Court granted Defendant’s first motion to dismiss and ordered Q 16 || Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint or advise the Court they did not intend to do so by
= || November 10, 2025. Pursuant to Rule 41(b), a district court may dismiss an action where the
18 || plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with a court order, including failure to amend in a timely || manner. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See also Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 992 (9th Cir. 1999) (Dismissal of an action for failure to amend in a timely manner was affirmed.). Here, Plaintiffs did not amend nor give notice of their intent not to amend. Accordingly, this case is 22 || dismissed with prejudice. 23 || ITISSO ORDERED. 25 Dated: December 4, 2025