Shallowhorn

Alfred Eugene Shallowhorn v. Hopper, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20253:25-cv-00222California4,465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN, Case No.: 3:25-cv-0222-RBM-MMP

CDCR #P-13049,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DENYING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO AMEND

AS MOOT; and HOPPER, et al., 16 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b) 18 19 On January 29, 2025, Plaintiff Alfred Eugene Shallowhorn, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) On May 27, 2025, the Court granted leave to proceed IFP and dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff was later granted an extension of time to amend on or before September 30, 2025. (Doc. 7.) On September 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to amend and filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on September 22, 2025. (Docs. 8–9.) Because the FAC was timely filed, Plaintiff’s Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.