Harris

David D. Harris v. Dr. Michael Santos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20253:25-cv-00284California1,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DAVID D. HARRIS, Case No.: 25-cv-284-JLS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL AND REQUEST FOR

DR. MICHAEL SANTOS,

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

13 Defendant. [Dkt. No. 28]

15 On November 28, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Request for Production of Documents. Dkt. No. 28. I. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Plaintiff argues that counsel should be appointed because his TABE1 score is a 6.6 and he suffers from auditory hallucinations and suicidal ideations. Id. at 2. Plaintiff further argues that he is in and out of mental hospitals throughout the state of California and often mentally incapacitated. Id. Plaintiff notes that he is currently taking medication that causes him to sleep for days at a time. Id. Plaintiff argues that he will be prejudiced without the appointment of counsel. Id. 25 26 “The TABE (Tests of Adult Basic …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.