Swenson
Mary Swenson v. John Kuehni and Blend Realty
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARY SWENSON, Case No.: 3:25-cv-01398-RBM-MSB
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) SCREENING AMENDED JOHN KUEHNI and BLEND REALTY,
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
Defendants. U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) [Doc. 13]
15 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REINSTATE
DISMISSED MOTIONS
17 [Doc. 14]
Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Mary Swenson’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Reinstate Dismissed Motions. (Doc. 14.) The filing makes several requests: (1) “fee waiver for amendment and corrective rule 60 divorce;” (2) “demand for ID documents and records unsealed;” (3) “there has been no discovery since Jan 2021 despite multiple requests;” (4) “Plaintiff seeks permission to electronically file + access to PACER system for due process;” (5) “[counsel] requested due to the disability caused and the 753 liens attached to my trust and person;” and (6) “Judge Montenegro should remove herself. She is clearly biased. …