Shaw

Laurence Jay Shaw v. Edwin Dario Manzano Garcia, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20254:24-cv-05826California824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAURENCE JAY SHAW, Case No. 24-cv-05826-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

APPEAR BY VIDEOCONFERENCE

v. AND DENYING MOTION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER

EDWIN DARIO MANZANO GARCIA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 85, 86 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Defendant Edwin Dario Manzano Garcia: a motion for protective order, Dkt. No. 85, and a motion for leave to appear by videoconference, Dkt. No. 86. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion for leave to appear by videoconference, but DENIES the motion for protective order. I. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR BY VIDEOCONFERENCE Mr. Garcia requests permission to participate in future hearings and discovery conferences by videoconference. Dkt. No. 86. Mr. Garcia resides in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.