People v. Lampe CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 8, 2025E084828California1,080 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Except in one respect that we note below, the underlying background facts are not

relevant to defendant’s present appeal. Suffice to say, a jury in March 2018 convicted

defendant of: (1) first degree murder with an enhancement for personally and

intentionally discharging a firearm causing death (Pen. Code,1 §§ 187, subd. (a),

12022.53, subd. (d)); (2) kidnapping with a personal use firearm enhancement (§§ 207,

subd. (a), 12022.53, subd. (b)); and (3) assault with a deadly weapon with a firearm use

enhancement (§§ 245, subd. (a)(2), 12022.5, subds. (a) & (d)). The trial court sentenced

defendant to an indeterminate term of 50 years to life, to follow a determinate term of

20 years four months. The sentence was comprised of: 25 years to life for murder plus

25 years to life for the firearm enhancement plus 1 year (stayed) for the arming

enhancement; the upper term of 8 years for kidnapping plus 10 years for the gun

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.

2 enhancement on that count; and 1 year for the assault with an additional 1 year 4 months

for that gun enhancement. (Lampe I, supra, E070676.)

On defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.