Bondi

Serrano Rios v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202524-5772California904 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 8 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARELI TERECITA SERRANO No. 24-5772 RIOS and FABER AREAN CHAVELAS SERRANO, Agency Nos.

A209-390-206

Petitioners, A209-390-207

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

Appeal from the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: MCKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

Areli Terecita Serrano Rios (“Serrano Rios”) and her son, Faber Arean

Chavelas Serrano (“Faber”), petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA’s”) order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of Serrano Rios’

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.