Bondi

Moreno Nieto v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202524-4471California813 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ANTONIO MORENO NIETO; No. 24-4471 WENDY ANDREA VALENZUELA Agency Nos.

ALVAREZ; ANTONY ALONSO A203-700-567

MORENO VALENZUELA; KIMBERLY A203-700-568

ELIZA MORENO VALENZUELA,

A203-700-569

A203-700-570

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 21, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Antonio Moreno Nieto, his wife Wendy Andrea Valenzuela Alvarez,

and their two minor children, all natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.