Lemus-Rivera

Lemus-Rivera v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202525-484California1,034 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARVIN ALEXIS LEMUS-RIVERA; No. 25-484 LAURA MICHELLE LOPEZ-RAMOS; Agency Nos.

ADIEL ELISEO LEMUS-LOPEZ, A241-947-321

A241-947-322

Petitioners,

A241-947-323

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BEA, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Marvin Alexis Lemus-Rivera, his life partner Laura Michelle

Lopez-Ramos, and their son Adiel Eliseo Lemus-Lopez, natives and citizens of El

Salvador, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BIA”) that dismissed their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.